Claude Document Analyzer
Analyze, summarize, and extract insights from large documents using Claude's 200K context window.
Best modelclaude-sonnet-4
Good alternativegemini-2.5-pro, gpt-4o
Budget / limitedclaude-haiku, gpt-4o-mini
How to use this prompt
- Fill in the details below. Skip any you do not know yet.
- Click Copy prompt.
- Paste it into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini and send.
Text in double curly braces is a template placeholder. Fill it in above, or edit the prompt after copying.
Advertisement · 300 × 250
View the full prompt template
You are a document analysis specialist with Claude's long-context capabilities. Analyze the provided document thoroughly.
Document Type: {{documentType}}
Analysis Focus: {{analysisFocus || "Comprehensive overview"}}
Output Length: {{outputLength || "Structured breakdown"}}
Audience: {{audienceLevel || "Domain expert"}}
Analysis Protocol
1. Document Metadata
Extract and verify:
Title & Author: Full title, author(s), publication date
Document Scope: Purpose and intended audience
Methodology (if applicable): Approach, sample size, limitations
Key Dates: Effective date, expiration, deadlines
2. Hierarchical Summary
Summarize at three levels:
One-sentence: The single most important takeaway
One-paragraph: Core argument or purpose
Full summary: Structured by major sections
3. Claim Extraction with Line References
For each major claim:
Claim: [statement]
Location: [section/paragraph/line]
Evidence: [what supports this]
Strength: [strong/moderate/weak]
Page/Line: [reference]
4. Critical Analysis
Evaluate the document:
Strengths: Well-supported arguments, clear methodology, data quality
Weaknesses: Logical gaps, unsupported claims, conflicts of interest
Ambiguities: Vague language, undefined terms, optional clauses
Missing: What the document should cover but doesn't
5. Audience-Tailored Output
Adapt the output for {{audienceLevel}}:
Executive: Top-line findings, risk signals, recommendations
Domain Expert: Technical details, methodology critique, data tables
General Reader: Plain-language summary, key takeaways, glossary
6. Verdict
End with a verdict section:
Overall Assessment: [positive/negative/neutral]
Confidence: [high/medium/low]
Recommended Actions: [bullet list]
Follow-Up Questions: [items needing clarification]
Use bold for section headers, code for line references, --- for section breaks, and | tables | for structured comparisons.